Welcome to wahabs.com

 
Search
_TOPICS
  Create an account    

Categories
  • Home
  • Downloads
  • FAQ
  • Feedback
  • News
  • Search
  • Statistics
  • Top

  • Top Ten Downloads
    · 1: Shahi Bukhari
    · 2: Shahi Muslim
    · 3: Desktop quran
    · 4: 8 different English Translation
    · 5: Arabic
    · 6: Screen Saver
    · 7: Quran and Science Compatible?
    · 8: Ad-Duha
    · 9: Abasa
    · 10: Ad-Dahr

    Random Headline

    History of Islam or related
    [ History of Islam or related ]

    ·THE AAD PEOPLE AND THE CITY OF ERAM
    ·Biblical Prophecies on the Advent of Muhammad (P.B.U.H)
    ·The History of 'Ashurah'
    ·Islam, Knowledge, and Science
    ·Civilisations retreat and advance as well
    ·"HAMAN"
    ·THE PEOPLE OF SABA AND THE ARIM FLOOD
    ·MOSES (PBUH) AND PHARAOH OF THE EXODUS
    ·NOAH (PBUH) AND THE FLOOD

    Misconceptions About the Human Genome Project
    Posted on Friday, October 28 @ 23:59:30 EDT by admin

    General Topics The completion of human's gene map today does not yield the result that man and ape are relatives. One need not be deceived by evolutionists' attempts to exploit this new scientific development just as they do with all others.

    As known, the recent completion of the human gene map within the scope of the Human Genome Project has been a very important scientific improvement. However, some results of this project are being distorted in some evolutionist publications. It is claimed that the genes of chimpanzees have a similarity to human genes by 98 % and this is promoted as an evidence to the claim that apes are close to humans, and therefore, to the theory of evolution. In truth, this is a "fake" evidence put forward by evolutionists who benefit from the lack of knowledge of society about this subject. 98 % Similarity Claim is a Misleading Propaganda First, it should be stated that the 98% similarity concept, frequently advanced by evolutionists about the DNAs of man and chimpanzee, is deceptive. In order to claim that the genetic make-ups of man and chimpanzee bear 98 % similarity, the genome of the chimpanzee also has to be mapped just as that of man's, the two has to be compared, and the result of this comparison has to be obtained. However no such result is available, because so far, only the gene of mankind has been mapped. No such research is yet done for the chimpanzee. In reality, the 98 % similarity between the genes of man and ape, which now and then becomes an agenda item, is a propaganda oriented slogan deliberately invented years ago. This similarity is an extraordinarily exaggerated generalization grounded on the similarity in the amino acid sequences of some 30-40 basic proteins present in man and chimpanzee. A sequence analysis has been made with a method named "DNA hybridization" on the DNA sequences that are correlated with these proteins and only those limited number of proteins have been compared. However there are about hundred thousand genes, and therefore 100 thousand proteins coded by these genes in humans. For that reason, there is no scientific basis for claiming that all the genes of man and ape are 98% similar only because of the similarity in 40 out of 100.000 proteins.
    On the other hand, the DNA comparison carried out on those 40 proteins is also controversial. This comparison was made in 1987 by two biologists named Sibley and Ahlquist and published in the periodical named Journal of Molecular Evolution. (v.26 pp. 99-1212) However another scientist named Sarich who examined the data obtained by these two scientists concluded that the reliability of the method they used is controversial and that the data has been exaggeratedly interpreted. (Sarich et al, 1989, Cladisticts 5:3-32) Dr. Don Batten, another biologist, also analyzed the issue in 1996 and concluded that the real similarity rate is 96.2%, not 98 %.(CEN, 19(1); 21-22 December 1996-February 1997)
    Human DNA is also similar to that of the worm, mosquito and chicken! Moreover, the above mentioned basic proteins are common vital molecules present in various other living beings. The structure of the same kinds of proteins present not only in chimpanzee, but also in completely different living beings, is very similar to that in the humans. For example, the genetic analyses published in New Scientist have revealed a 75 % similarity between the DNAs of nematode worms and man. (New Scientist, 15 May 1999, p.27) This definitely does not mean that there is only a 25% difference between man and these worms! According to the family tree made by evolutionists, the Chordata phylum, in which man is included, and Nematoda phylum were different from each other even 530 million years ago.
    On the other hand, in another finding which also appeared in the Turkish media, it was stated that the comparisons carried out between the genes of fruit fly belonging to the Drosophila species and human genes yielded a similarity of 60%. (Hurriyet, 24 February 2000)
    On the other hand, the analyses done on some proteins show man as close to some very different living beings. In a survey carried out by the researchers in Cambridge University, some proteins of land dwelling animals were compared. Amazingly, in nearly all samples, man and chicken were paired as the closest relatives. The next closest relative was crocodile. (New Scientist v.103, 16 August 1984, p.19)
    These examples certify that the concept of genetic similarity does not constitute evidence for the theory of evolution. This is because the genetic similarities are not in line with the alleged evolution schemes, and on the contrary, they yield completely opposite results. Similarities are not Evidence for Evolution but for Creation It is surely natural for the human body to bear some molecular similarities to other living beings, because they all are made up of the same molecules, they all use the same water and atmosphere, and they all consume foods consisting of the same molecules. Certainly, their metabolisms and therefore genetic make-ups would resemble to one another. This, however, is not evidence that they evolved from a common ancestor. This "common material" is not the result of an evolution but of "common design", that is, their being created upon the same plan. It is possible to explain this subject with an example; all constructions in the world are done with similar materials (brick, iron, cement, etc.). This, however, does not mean that these buildings "evolved" from each other. They are constructed separately by using common materials. The same is true for living beings as well. Life did not originate as a result of unconscious coincidences as evolution claims, but as the result of the creation of Allah, the Almighty, the owner of infinite knowledge and wisdom.

    Old Articles
    Wednesday, February 25
    · AERODYNAMIC FORCES AND THE FLIGHT PROGRAMMED IN BIRDS
    Saturday, February 21
    · Noah's Flood and the Ancient Black Sea Flood
    Friday, February 06
    · Islamic Banks Surge, Thanks to Financial Crisis
    Wednesday, February 04
    · Darwinists Have Deceived the World with Fraud
    Tuesday, April 29
    · Utbah ibn Ghazwan
    Wednesday, April 23
    · A Messenger to Entire Humanity
    · The Basis of Islam
    Tuesday, April 15
    · Hijab - Unveiling the Mystery
    · How to Train Your will power to work for you
    Monday, April 07
    · THE AAD PEOPLE AND THE CITY OF ERAM

    Older Articles

    Moon and Sun
    Update by U.S. Naval Observatory

    Click here for more information
    Moon
    Update by NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

    Click here for a larger image
    Sun

    Block created for PHPNuke 6 .0 by Chris Karakas




    PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.
    Page Generation: 0.09 Seconds